Back to all blogs

By Andrew Drue

Subscribe to Tech Decoded weekly newsletter

Introduction to Serverless Computing and Pricing

Serverless computing has transformed how developers build and deploy applications in the cloud. Instead of managing servers, you simply write code and let the cloud provider handle the infrastructure. But with this convenience comes a complex pricing landscape that can impact your bottom line significantly.

Pay-per-use computing lies at the heart of the serverless promise—you only pay for what you use, down to milliseconds of execution time and individual function calls. This fundamentally changes how we think about cloud costs. Unlike traditional servers where you pay for idle capacity, serverless scales to zero when not in use, potentially saving significant money for variable workloads.

But serverless pricing isn't as simple as cloud providers make it sound. Each platform—AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions—has its own pricing model with unique nuances that can dramatically affect your monthly bill. Understanding these differences isn't just academic—it could save your organization thousands of dollars.

Let's dive deep into how these pricing models work and help you determine which provider offers the best value for your specific use case.

The Fundamentals of Serverless Pricing

Before comparing providers, let's break down what you're actually paying for in serverless computing:

• Execution time (measured in GB-seconds or GHz-seconds)

• Memory allocation (impacts both performance and cost)

• Number of invocations (how often your functions run)

• Data transfer (moving data in and out of functions)

Each provider has a free tier designed to let developers experiment without cost, but these vary significantly in generosity. AWS provides 1 million free requests per month, Azure offers 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds, while Google Cloud gives you 2 million invocations.

Are there hidden costs in serverless computing? Absolutely. Beyond the basic execution charges, you'll encounter costs for:

• API Gateway or equivalent services for HTTP triggers

• Storage for function code and dependencies

• Database operations and storage

• Logging and monitoring

• Data transfer between regions and services

Cold starts—when your function hasn't run recently and needs to be initialized—can also add significant costs for latency-sensitive applications. These aren't explicitly billed but require higher memory allocations to mitigate, increasing your GB-second consumption.

AWS Lambda Pricing Deep Dive

AWS Lambda pioneered serverless computing and its pricing model has become the industry standard. Here's how it breaks down in 2025:

• Request pricing: $0.20 per million requests

• Compute pricing: $0.0000166667 per GB-second

• Free tier: 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds per month

Lambda allows memory configuration from 128MB to 10GB, with CPU allocation scaling proportionally with memory. Duration is billed in 1ms increments, making it extremely granular.

What makes Lambda unique is its wide array of integration options within the AWS ecosystem. However, these integrations often carry their own costs. For example, API Gateway (commonly used with Lambda) costs $1.00 per million requests, which can exceed your Lambda execution costs.

Case Study: E-commerce Flash Sale A retail company implemented a serverless architecture for their flash sales event, processing 50 million requests in 24 hours. With Lambda's pricing:

• Function execution (200ms avg, 256MB): $416.67

• API Gateway costs: $50.00

• Total: $466.67

This represented a 70% cost reduction compared to their previous provisioned infrastructure that needed to handle peak capacity.

Lambda Pricing Table for Different Memory Allocations

Azure Functions Pricing Analysis

Microsoft Azure Functions offers two primary pricing plans: Consumption and Premium. The Consumption plan is truly serverless with pay-per-use pricing:

• Execution time: $0.000016 per GB-second

• Requests: $0.20 per million executions

• Free grant: 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds

The Premium plan starts at around $0.173 per hour but includes enhanced performance, no cold starts, and VNet connectivity.

What makes Azure interesting is how it integrates with Microsoft's broader enterprise ecosystem. Organizations already invested in Microsoft products often find cost advantages through bundling and enterprise agreements.

Azure's pricing for serverless data processing cost comparison for large datasets is particularly competitive when using Azure Functions with integration services like Event Hubs and Cosmos DB. For data-intensive applications, Azure offers pricing advantages through its unified ecosystem.

Azure Functions Premium Plan Benefits Worth The Cost

• Pre-warmed instances eliminate cold start costs

• Virtual network connectivity for secure internal applications

• Longer running functions (up to 60 minutes vs 10 minutes on Consumption plan)

• More predictable pricing for consistent workloads

Google Cloud Functions Pricing Breakdown

Google Cloud Functions has perhaps the most straightforward pricing model of the three major providers:

• Invocations: $0.40 per million invocations

• Compute time: $0.0000025 per GHz-second

• Memory: $0.0000025 per GB-second

• Free tier: 2 million invocations and 400,000 GB-seconds of compute time

Google prices CPU and memory separately, which can benefit compute-intensive functions that don't need much memory. This makes it particularly well-suited for serverless data processing cost comparison for large datasets that need computational power but modest memory footprints.

Google's free tier is notably generous with double the free invocations compared to AWS and Azure, making it attractive for low-volume or experimental workloads.

Google also offers Cloud Run, which bridges the gap between serverless functions and containers. For longer-running processes or when you need more control over the runtime, Cloud Run can be more cost-effective than Cloud Functions.

Head-to-Head Price Comparison: AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud

Which serverless platform is most cost-effective for high-volume workloads? Let's break it down with a direct comparison for different scenarios:

Scenario 1: Basic API Endpoint (10 million monthly requests, 128MB, 100ms average duration)

For this basic scenario, Azure Functions has a slight edge.

Scenario 2: Data Processing (1 million monthly requests, 1GB memory, 1s average duration)

Again, Azure edges out AWS slightly, while Google is more expensive.

Scenario 3: ML Inference (100,000 requests, 4GB memory, 5s duration)

These comparisons show that for most common scenarios, AWS and Azure offer similar pricing, with Azure having a slight edge. Google Cloud Functions tends to be more expensive for pure execution costs but may offer advantages for specific workload types.

Cross-region Data Transfer Pricing in Serverless Architectures

One often overlooked aspect of serverless pricing is data transfer costs, especially across regions. This becomes crucial for global applications.

Cross-region data transfer pricing in serverless architectures varies significantly:

• AWS: $0.02 per GB between regions in the same continent, $0.09 per GB between continents

• Azure: $0.02 per GB within a continent, $0.05-0.12 per GB between continents

• Google Cloud: $0.01-0.08 per GB depending on source and destination regions

For applications with substantial cross-region data transfer requirements, these costs can actually exceed your function execution costs. I've seen multiple cases where companies were surprised to find data transfer representing over 60% of their serverless bill.

Real-World Pricing Scenarios and Use Cases

Let's look at some common scenarios where serverless computing excels:

Event Processing Workloads

For event-driven architectures processing messages from queues or streams:

• Best for low volume, irregular traffic: AWS Lambda with SQS (simplest setup)

• Best for high volume, consistent processing: Azure Functions Premium Plan

• Best for data analytics pipelines: Google Cloud Functions with Pub/Sub

Web Application API Backends

Modern web applications commonly use serverless for backend APIs:

• Best for microservices with many endpoints: AWS Lambda with API Gateway

• Best for .NET applications: Azure Functions (native integration)

• Best for containerized APIs: Google Cloud Run (not strictly serverless but similar pricing model)

Case Study: Financial Services API A fintech startup moved their transaction processing API to serverless:

• Previous monthly cost (2 dedicated servers): $720

• New AWS Lambda implementation: $210

• Additional API Gateway cost: $150

• Total serverless cost: $360

• Monthly savings: 50%

Plus, they gained automatic scaling during peak trading hours without capacity planning.

Cost Optimization Strategies for Serverless Computing

No matter which platform you choose, these strategies will help minimize costs:

Right-size memory allocations

• Test different memory configurations to find the sweet spot where execution time is balanced with GB-second costs

• Often increasing memory slightly can reduce execution time enough to lower overall costs

Optimize function code

• Reduce initialization time and dependency size

• Use bundling tools to minimize deployment package size

• Implement efficient error handling to avoid wasted execution time

Use appropriate timeout values

• Don't set timeouts higher than necessary

• Consider breaking long-running processes into smaller functions

Leverage caching

• Implement response caching at the API Gateway level

• Use in-memory caching for frequently accessed data

• Consider dedicated caching services for hot data

Monitor and analyze costs regularly

• Set up cost alerts and dashboards

• Review cost allocation tags

• Identify and optimize your most expensive functions

Hidden Costs and Gotchas in Serverless Pricing

Are there hidden costs in serverless computing? Absolutely, and they can catch even experienced developers off guard:

The API Gateway Tax

The most common hidden cost comes from API Gateway or similar services:

• AWS API Gateway: $1.00 per million requests (5x the Lambda request cost!)

• Azure API Management: $0.60 - $3.50 per million calls depending on tier

• Google Cloud API Gateway: $0.70 - $7.00 per million calls

For HTTP-triggered functions, these costs often exceed your actual execution costs.

Data Transfer Surprises

Outbound data transfer costs apply to all responses from your functions:

• First 1GB is typically free

• $0.05 - $0.12 per GB after that depending on region and provider

A function returning 500KB responses can rack up significant data transfer costs at scale.

Cold Start Penalties

Cold starts don't appear directly on your bill but force you to:

• Allocate more memory than functionally necessary (increasing GB-second costs)

• Pay for provisioned concurrency or premium plans

• Implement "warming" strategies that generate artificial invocations

Logging and Monitoring Costs

Serverless architectures often require more intensive logging:

• CloudWatch Logs (AWS): $0.50 per GB ingested, $0.03 per GB stored

• Azure Monitor: $2.30 per GB ingested

• Google Cloud Logging: First 50GB free, then $0.50-$1.00 per GB

For high-volume production systems, logging can become a major cost center.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Serverless Provider for Your Budget

After this deep dive into serverless computing pricing models compared: AWS vs Azure vs Google, we can draw some conclusions:

• AWS Lambda offers the most mature ecosystem with balanced pricing. It's ideal for companies already using AWS and for general-purpose serverless applications.

• Azure Functions edges out slightly on pure execution costs and shines for enterprises already using Microsoft products. The integration benefits can outweigh minor pricing differences.

• Google Cloud Functions has the most generous free tier and unique pricing model that separates CPU and memory, making it attractive for specific computational workloads and experimentation.

The best choice depends on:

• Your specific workload characteristics

• Your existing cloud provider relationships

• The ecosystem services you need to integrate with

• Your organization's familiarity with each platform

Remember that the true cost of serverless goes beyond the basic execution pricing. Consider the entire ecosystem of services your application will use, including data transfer, API management, and monitoring costs.

Pay-per-use computing delivers on its promise of cost efficiency—but only when you fully understand the pricing models and optimize your implementation accordingly.

Have you migrated to serverless? What surprising costs did you encounter? Share your experiences in the comments below!

Your source for the latest tech news, guides, and reviews.

PAGES

About Us

Contribute

Blog

Privacy Policy

CONTACT

INFORMATION

[email protected]

tech-decoded

Receive Tech Decoded's Newsletter in your inbox every week.

NEWSLETTER